THE 2007-08
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
6450 Dr. Phillip’s Blvd.
(407) 370-7200
_files/image002.gif)
School
Improvement Plan
Year: 2007-08
|
PROFILE |
|
|
|
DISTRICT VISION |
|
To be the top producer of successful students in the nation |
|
SOUTHWEST VISION |
|
We envision a
school that is a community of learners and that provides a variety of
experiences meant to enable To realize our
vision, we must demonstrate a commitment to both professional
collaboration/growth and to educate To that end, we
must study appropriate data, create responsive programs for students, and
assess our own effectiveness in light of high standards and in order to
facilitate necessary vitality and change. |
School
Improvement Plan
Year: 2007-08
Development
of the School Improvement Plan
The district ENDS Policy, District Performance Goals, and the Comprehensive Academic Achievement Plan (CAAP) were all used to develop our school improvement plan. The plan is a tool for identifying and creating a desirable future for our students and school. The school improvement plan process will enable us to anticipate and manage the complex changes that we face. Furthermore, because our School Advisory Council is broadly representative of our school’s community, we are confident that our school improvement plan reflects a shared vision of success for all of our students.
We began the strategic planning process by developing and clarifying a vision statement for our school. Our vision statement expresses the "desirable future" we want to create and is presented on the previous page.
In order to assess the needs of our school, we collected and analyzed a great deal of data. From these data we identified a number of priority needs, which are stated in our plan. These needs formed the basis for our plan this year.
The mission of the Orange County Public Schools is, “Each student will acquire the skills, attitudes, and knowledge necessary to reach full potential.” Based on this mission, we reviewed the District Performance Goals and built objectives around the goals that reflected the priority needs of our school. OCPS has also identified six supporting conditions to help accomplish the district’s mission. We reviewed and selected the supporting conditions that related to our needs assessment.
The purpose of the OCPS CAAP is to create curriculum consistency for all
students and provide instructional strategies that meet the needs of our
diverse student population. To make this
happen, developmental, accelerated, and remedial strategies have been
incorporated into this plan to ensure student achievement.
Our school improvement plan focuses on how we will work toward meeting the needs at our school. We used the results of our needs assessment as a starting point to select and develop four-year objectives. We used the needs assessment results to address budget, training, instructional materials, technology, staffing, student support services, specific school safety, discipline strategies, student health and fitness, including physical fitness, parental information on student health/fitness, and indoor environmental air quality. The SAC’s assistance was used to prepare the budget for next year so that it effectively supports the school improvement plan.
Annual objectives were developed to identify where we would be at the end of each year of our four‑year objectives or objectives based on the supporting conditions. Finally, action plans were written, which outlined the activities that needed to be completed in order to reach our annual objectives. These action plans are clearly defined activities that show what we will accomplish in working toward our objectives.
The four state education goals,
Our school is committed to improving access to high quality instruction
for all students. This includes increasing the percentage of African-American
and Hispanic students enrolled in advanced level courses.
Once our plan was completed, it was reviewed by our community, the area superintendent, the superintendent, and the school board. This review focused on determining how much progress toward state goals and the district's mission would result from the implementation of the plan. When the school board approved our plan, they agreed that achieving the annual objectives would produce adequate progress toward meeting these important goals.
The actual implementation of our plan will be evaluated at two points during the school year. The first review of progress will be in December-January with the area superintendent. The mid-year progress review will determine if we are on schedule in completing the action plan activities that are written in our plan and data showing progress at the middle of the school year. The final progress report is made after the school year is over. At that time, we will determine if we accomplished our annual objectives. We will use those results to begin our needs assessment for next year.
School
Improvement Plan
READING OBJECTIVE
|
District
|
|
|
Baseline Expectations (Percent of Students) If a school has exceeded the baseline
expectations, the improvement target in following years will be an
improvement of 3 percentage points per year.
After a school reaches 90 percent on any of these performance targets,
the target in future years will be to maintain performance. |
|
|
Reading
Performance: |
Elementary: 85 Middle Schools: 65 High Schools: 60 |
|
Reading
Learning Gains: |
Elementary: 70 Middle Schools: 75 High Schools: 75 |
|
Reading
Lowest 25 Percent Learning Gains: |
Elementary: 70 Middle Schools: 75 High Schools: 65 |
|
Narrative to Describe Major Steps to Meet Baseline Expectations in My vision for |
|
|
|
|
|
Four-Year
Objectives: |
By July 2011, 90 percent
of all students taking the FCAT Reading test at By July 2011, 78 percent
of all students taking the FCAT Reading test at By July 2011, 81 percent
of all students taking the FCAT Reading test at |
|
2007-08 Needs
Statement: |
In June 2007, 81 percent
of students at In June 2007, 66 percent
of students at In June 2007, 69 percent
of students at |
|
2007-08 Annual
Objectives: |
By July 2008, 84 percent of all students
taking the FCAT Reading test at By July 2008, 69 percent of all students
taking the FCAT Reading test at By July 2008, 72 percent of all students
taking the FCAT Reading test at |
|
2007-08 Mid-Year
Progress: |
Enter progress made at mid-year of 2007-08
here. |
|
2007-08 Results: |
Enter baseline data from 2007-08 here when it is available. |
|
|
|
|
2008-09 Needs
Statement: |
Enter baseline data from
2007-08 for all three reading statements here. |
|
2008-09 Annual
Objectives: |
Enter all three of the annual objectives
for 2008-09 here. |
|
2008-09 Mid-Year
Progress: |
Enter progress made at mid-year of 2008-09
here. |
|
2008-09 Results: |
Enter baseline data from 2008-09 here when it is available. |
|
|
|
|
2009-10 Needs
Statement: |
Enter baseline data from
2008-09 for all three reading statements here. |
|
2009-10 Annual
Objectives: |
Enter all three of the annual objectives
for 2009-10 here. |
|
2009-10 Mid-Year
Progress: |
Enter progress made at mid-year of 2009-10
here. |
|
2009-10 Results: |
Enter baseline data from 2009-10 here when it is available. |
|
|
|
|
2010-11 Needs
Statement: |
Enter baseline data from
2009-10 for all three reading statements here. |
|
2010-11 Annual
Objectives: |
Enter all three of the annual objectives
for 2010-11 here. |
|
2010-11 Mid-Year
Progress: |
Enter progress made at mid-year of 2010-11
here. |
|
2010-11 Results: |
Enter baseline data
from 2010-11 here when it is available. |
|
Do rules,
regulations, policies, or laws at the state or district level prevent the
school from accomplishing this plan? |
Yes: |
|
No: |
X |
|
Yes: |
|
No: |
X |
|
|
Appendix F contains the form and
procedures for requesting a waiver. |
||||
School
Improvement Plan
Action Plan for
2007-08
|
|
|
|
Status |
||
|
Activities (INCLUDE END DATE) |
Funding Source |
Position of
Responsibility |
Completed |
In Progress |
Planned |
|
1. Prepare
students for and administer the PSAT to AVID participants to increase
academic rigor (October 2007) |
School Improvement |
Principal |
|
|
|
|
2.
Continue Write Traits through Language Arts classes (May 2008) |
Budget |
Principal |
|
|
|
|
3.
Continue the use of Successmaker into reading program for Level 1 and
Level 2 readers including ESE (May 2008) |
Budget |
Principal |
|
|
|
|
4.
Continue established literacy council for studying the data and
writing the literacy curriculum (May 2008) |
Budget |
Principal, CRT |
|
|
|
|
5. Provide
training for all teachers in CRISS (May 2008) |
Staff Development Budget |
Teacher trainers, Reading
Coach |
|
|
|
|
6.
Continue Word of the Day utilizing FCAT vocabulary (May 2008) |
Budget |
Teacher Trainers |
|
|
|
|
7.
Continue daily reading period (Sea Lion Time) for all students (May
2008) |
Budget |
Principal |
|
|
|
|
8. All
Language Arts teachers will continue to use Springboard Curriculum as part of
their curriculum (May 2008) |
School Improvement |
Principal, Language Arts
Chairperson |
|
|
|
|
9.
Continue 55-minute and 110-minute reading block as required (May 2008) |
Budget |
Principal, Reading Coach,
LRS, API |
|
|
|
|
10. Increase the number of tutors for AVID
program students to increase academic rigor (May 2008) |
School Improvement |
Principal, Dean, Teachers |
|
|
|
|
11. Provide intensive Saturday tutoring program
for students who scored Level 1 and Level 2 on FCAT Reading (May 2008) |
School Improvement |
Principal, Dean, Teachers |
|
|
|
Funding Source: Designate where funds will come from, if
applicable, such as School Improvement Funds, School Budget, Title I funds, or
a grant.
School
Improvement Plan
MATH OBJECTIVE
|
District
|
|
|
Baseline Expectations (Percent of Students) If a school has exceeded the baseline
expectations, the improvement target in following years will be an improvement
of 3 percentage points per year. After
a school reaches 90 percent on any of these performance targets, the target
in future years will be to maintain performance. |
|
|
Math
Performance: |
Elementary: 80 Middle Schools: 70 High Schools: 80 |
|
Math
Learning Gains: |
Elementary: 70 Middle Schools: 75 High Schools: 75 |
|
Math
Lowest 25 Percent Learning Gains: |
Elementary: 70 Middle Schools: 75 High Schools: 75 |
|
Narrative to Describe Major Steps to Meet Baseline Expectations in
Math Within Four Years: My vision for |
|
|
|
|
|
Four-Year
Objectives: |
By July 2011, 92 percent
of all students taking the FCAT Math test at By July 2011, 92 percent
of all students taking the FCAT Math test at By July 2011, 85 percent
of all students taking the FCAT Math test at |
|
2007-08 Needs
Statement: |
In June 2007, 81 percent
of students at In June 2007, 79 percent
of students at In June 2007, 73 percent
of students at |
|
2007-08 Annual
Objectives: |
By July 2008, 84 percent of all students
taking the FCAT Math test at By July 2008, 82 percent of all students
taking the FCAT Math test at By July 2008, 76 percent of all students
taking the FCAT Math test at |